Preview

Novelty. Experiment. Traditions (N.Ex.T)

Advanced search

Reimbursement of Procedural Costs to a Defense Counsel by Appointment in Criminal Proceedings: Problems and Solutions

Abstract

The article is concerned with the issues of payment for the participation of a lawyer — a defender in criminal cases, within the framework of the institution of procedural costs. The author puts forward a hypothesis that the lack of a clear distribution of the procedure for paying remuneration to a defender for his participation in a criminal case at various stages of the process and various authorized persons entails a lack of uniformity in the application of the norms of criminal procedure legislation, as well as systemic law enforcement practice. This gives rise to a certain lack of independence of the institution of procedural costs. The author fializes the study by identifying the solution to the above problem which consists in the need of supplementing the criminal procedural legislation with imperative norms that will avoid ambiguous interpretation of the law.

About the Author

A. S. Krasikova
North-Western Institute of Management, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

 Anna S. Krasikova, Faculty of Law

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Белоусова Е. А., Тертычная А. И. Теоретические и практические аспекты гражданского иска в уголовном процессе // Новизна. Эксперимент. Традиции (Н.Экс.Т), 2022. Т. 8. № 2 (18). С. 6–15. URL: https://www.nxtjournal.ru/jour/article/view/239 (дата обращения: 30.01.2023).

2. Драничникова Н. В. Проблемы применения института процессуальных издержек в уголовном судопроизводстве // Правопорядок: история, теория, практика, 2022. № 1 (32). С. 123–127. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-primeneniyainstituta-protsessualnyh-izderzhek-v-ugolovnom-sudoproizvodstve (дата обращения: 01.02.2023).

3. Зеленин С. Р. Судебные издержки и их место в уголовном судопроизводстве по Уставу 1864 года // Журнал российского права, 2021. Т. 25. № 4. С. 129–143. URL: https://jrpnorma.ru/issue/2021/4 (дата обращения: 29.01.2023).

4. Медведева А. С. Роль суда в восполнении пробелов в праве // Новизна. Эксперимент. Традиции (Н.Экс.Т), 2020. Т. 6. № 1. С. 47–54. URL: https://www.nxtjournal. ru/jour/article/view/9/8 (дата обращения: 15.02.2023).

5. Уваров С. Ю. Спорные вопросы при взыскании процессуальных издержек [Электронный ресурс] / С. Ю. Уваров // Уголовный процесс, 2019. № 7. С. 70–75. URL:https://e.ugpr.ru/737471 (дата обращения: 02.02.2023).


Review

For citations:


Krasikova A.S. Reimbursement of Procedural Costs to a Defense Counsel by Appointment in Criminal Proceedings: Problems and Solutions. Novelty. Experiment. Traditions (N.Ex.T). 2023;9(2 (22)):76-85. (In Russ.)

Views: 207


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-3625 (Online)