From Ethical Illusions to Political Reality: Criticising Normative Approaches in International Security Studies
Abstract
The paper deals with the critical analysis of R. Floyd’s “theory of just securitization”, which attempts to incorporate universal moral and ethical norms into security practices. Via the comparative analysis of global political cases, the author demonstrates the main contradictions of this normative theory: (1) the impossibility of objectively verifying existential threats, (2) the neglect of proportionality and damage minimization criteria under the pressure of bureaucratic and political interests, (3) the instrumentalization of humanitarian rhetoric for strategic purposes, and (4) the narrowness of the value base grounded in the Western liberal model. These contradictions reveal that without established mechanisms of supranational enforcement, ethical criteria remain primarily a rhetorical resource. Thus, normative approaches in security studies prove to be only marginally useful for analysing and explaining state’s actions in the research works on security issues. At the same time, it is essential to acknowledge the importance of the normative discourse as a tool that encourages rethinking the boundaries of what is acceptable in the realm of security, and can encourage securitizing actors to develop more balanced decisions.
About the Authors
R. A. Alekseev
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Roman A. Alekseev, MA student
North-Western Institute of Management; Faculty of International Relations
and Political Studies
Saint Petersburg
O. S. Gaidaev
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg S. Gaidaev, Academic Supervisor, Senior Lecturer of the Department, PhD of Political Sciences
North-Western Institute of Management; Faculty of International Relations and Political Studies; Department of International Relations
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Gaidaev, O. S. (2021) Theory of securitisation, or the well-forgotten old: to the question of theoretical and philosophical origins and the origin of the theory // Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: International Relations. Vol. 21, No. 1. Pp. 20–32. (In Russ.)
2. Dekalchuk, A. A. (2013) The penetration of philosophical concepts into the theory of international relations (The case of John Austin’s speech act theory and Ole Wever’s securitisation theory) // Philosophical Sciences. No. 8. Pp. 39–50. (In Russ.)
3. Balzacq, T., Léonard, S., Ruzicka, J. (2016) ‘Securitization’revisited: Theory and cases // International relations. Vol. 30, No. 4. Pp. 494–531.
4. Booth, K., Wheeler, N. J. (2008) The security dilemma // Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Browning, C. S., McDonald, M. (2013) The future of critical security studies: Ethics and the politics of security // European journal of international relations. Vol. 19, No. 2. Pp. 235–255.
6. Chivvis, C. S. (2015) The French War on Al Qa’ida in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
7. Floyd, R. (2011) Can securitization theory be used in normative analysis? Towards a just securitization theory // Security Dialogue. Vol. 42, No. 4–5. Pp. 427–439.
8. Floyd, R. (2019) The morality of security: A theory of just securitization. Cambridge University Press.
9. Guild, E. (2013) Security and Migration in the 21<sup>st</sup> Century. John Wiley & Sons.
10. Hansen, L. (2012) Reconstructing desecuritisation: the normative-political in the Copenhagen School and directions for how to apply it // Review of international studies. Vol. 38, No. 3. Pp. 525–546.
11. Hartnett, S. J., Stengrim, L. A. (2004) “The whole operation of deception”: Reconstructing President Bush’s rhetoric of weapons of mass destruction // Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies. Vol. 4, No. 2. Pp. 152–197.
12. Kirshner, A. S., Spinner-Halev, J. (2024) Why political philosophy should be robust // American Political Science Review. Vol. 118, No. 4. Pp. 1658–1670.
13. Kuperman, A. J. (2013) A model humanitarian intervention? Reassessing NATO’s Libya campaign // International Security. Vol. 38, No. 1. Pp. 105–136.
14. McDonald, M. (2008) Securitization and the Construction of Security // European journal of international relations. Vol. 14, No. 4. Pp. 563–587.
15. Mearsheimer, J. (2024) The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities / Translation from English. Sevastopol: Tavria. 440 p. (In Russ.)
16. Sahu, A. K. (2021) From securitization to just securitization and just desecuritization: establishing synergy between ethics and security.
17. Salter, M. B., Mutlu, C. E. (2013) Securitisation and Diego Garcia // Review of International Studies. Vol. 39, No. 4. Pp. 815–834.
18. Smith, C. S., Hung, L.-C. (2010) The patriot act: Issues and controversies. Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
19. Taureck, R. (2006) Securitization theory and securitization studies // Journal of International relations and Development. Vol. 9. Pp. 53–61.
20. Van Rythoven, E. (2020) The securitization dilemma // Journal of Global Security Studies. Vol. 5, No. 3. Pp. 478–493.
21. Wæver, O. (1993) Securitization and desecuritization. Centre for Peace and Conflict Research. Copenhagen.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Alekseev R.A., Gaidaev O.S. From Ethical Illusions to Political Reality: Criticising Normative Approaches in International Security Studies. Novelty. Experiment. Traditions (N.Ex.T). 2025;11(4 (32)):21-28. (In Russ.)
Views:
35
Email this article 
