Trade Wars: Impact of Interdependence and Asymmetry in Economic Relations on their Outcomes

The paper is concerned with the asymmetry in the economic relationship between the United States of America (USA) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC), focusing on the implications of their trade war. The objective is to predict which nation could withstand greater economic pressure and potentially win a severe trade confrontation. Employing a multi faceted approach, the study utilizes the Sectoral Hirschmann index, Regional Hirschmann index, Marginal Propensity to Import (MPM), and Import Penetration index to analyze trade dynamics. The results have shown the increase of China’s export diversifi cation, as evidenced by its Sectoral Hirschmann index with a downward trend, as well as its signifi cantly lower Regional Hirschm ann index, indicating that China is actively seeking to penetrate various international markets, reducing reliance on the USA. Conversely, the USA exhibits a stable, diversifi ed export structure, but its trend of index shows a growing concentration in certain sectors. China’s high import penetration index refl ects its dependency on imports, typical of its role in the global supply chain, while the USA’s lower index suggests strong domestic production. The fi ndings suggest that the USA is more independent in absolute terms, but in terms of trends, China’s proactive economic strategies post-trade war have been more effective, and, if the trends persist, the USA risks losing the trade war in the future. The author concludes by emphasizing the importance of trade diversifi cation for nations to enhance resilience against geopolitical and economic uncertainties.

1. Bellora, C., Fontagne, L. G. (2020) Shooting Oneself in the Foot? Trade War and Global Value Chains // CEPII Working Paper. – No. 2019. – 18.

2. Benguria, F., Choi, J., Swenson, D. L., Xu, M. (2022) Anxiety or pain? The impact of tariffs and uncertainity on Chinese fi rms in the trade war // Journal of International Economics. – Vol. 137. – 103608.

3. Bolt, W., Mavromatis, K., van Wijnbergen, S. (2019) The Global Macroeconomics of a Trade War. The Eagle Model on the US-China Trade Confl ict / De Nederlandsche Bank Working Paper. – No. 623.

4. Carvalho, M., Azevedo, A., Massuquetti, A. (2019) Emerging Countries and the Effects of the Trade War between US China // Economies. – Vol. 7. – No. 2 – 45.

5. Danilin I. V. (2020) Sino-American Technology War: Risks and Perspectives for PRC and Global Technological Sector // Comparative Politics. – No. 4. – Pp. 160–176.

6. Fajgelbaum, P. D., Khandelwal A. K. (2022) The Economic Impacts of the US-China Trade War // Annual Review of Economics. – Vol. 14. – Pp. 205–228.

7. Fajgelbaum, P., Goldberg, P., Kennedy, P., Khandelwal, A., Taglioni, D. (2024) The US-China Trade War and Global Reallocations // American Economic Review: Insights. – Vol. 6. – No. 2. – Pp. 295–312.

8. Gordienko, D. V. (2021) Trade War and Sanction Struggle of USA and PRC // Herald of MFJU. – No. 1. – Pp. 68–88.

9. He, C., Li, J., Wang, W., Zhang, P. (2024) Regional resilience during a trade war: The role of the global connections and local networks // Journal of World Business. – Vol. 59. – No. 5. – 101567.

10. Itakura, K. (2020) Evaluating the Impact of the US-China Trade War // Asian Economic Policy Review. – Vol. 15. – Pp. 77–93.

11. Kapustina, L., Lipkova, L., Silin, Y., Drevalev, A. (2020) US-China Trade War: Causes and Outcomes // SHS Web Conf. – Vol. 73. – P. 01012. – DOI 10.1051/shsconf/20207301012. – EDN YDGYXD

12. Neradovskih, A. D. (2020) Perspectives of Development of Trade War between PRC and USA // Herald of Science and Education. – No. 15-2 (93). – Pp. 29–32.

13. Park, C.-Y., Petri, P. A., Plummer, M.G. (2021) The Economics of Confl ict and Cooperation in the Asia-Pacifi c: RCEP, CPTPP and the US-China Trade War // East Asian Economic Review. – Vol. 25. – No. 3. – Pp. 233–272.

14. Steinbock, D. (2018) U.S.-China Trade War and Its Global Impacts // China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies. – Vol. 4. – No. 4. – Pp. 515–542.