The Discourse of the Republic of Singapore Foreign Policy Strategy in the Field of Ensuring Regional Security in the Second Half of the 2010s
Abstract
Against the backdrop of growing competition between the United States and China in East Asia, there is a tendency to reduce the role of the United States in Southeast Asia. The role of the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China in relation to the national interests of the Republic of Singapore is being lost from the foreign policy discourse of the second half of the 2010s. This case is caused by the growing uncertainty of the republic in the ability to control the processes that at this stage have become factors in the system of international relations. ASEAN becomes the “cornerstone” of the foreign policy process in the field of security of the Republic of Singapore. The Republic of Singapore seeks to balance the foreign policy process in the context of competition between the United States and China in the Southeast Asia region. The Republic of Singapore can no longer correlate its foreign policy strategy exclusively with one global actor, which in turn forms a multi-vector foreign policy strategy based on the potential and actorhood of ASEAN. Understanding the above tendency and vital national interests of the Republic of Singapore seems even more important in expanding the international agenda on the part of the Russian Federation in the context of bilateral and interregional cooperation, especially in view of the creation of a free trade zone between the EAEU and the Republic of Singapore.
About the Author
A. M. TitovichRussian Federation
Adam M. Titovich, 1st year Master Student, Faculty of International Relations and Political Studies
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Демьянков В. З. Текст и дискурс как термины и слова обыденного языка // Язык. Личность. Текст: Сборник к 70-летию Т. М. Николаевой / Ин-т славяноведения РАН; отв. ред. проф. В. Н. Топоров. М. : Языки славянских культур, 2005. С. 34–55.
2. Орлова О. Г. Авторская дискурсивная модель публицистики о России (Э. Бэрри) // Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: История. Филология, 2013.
3. Силантьев И. В. Текст в системе дискурсных взаимодействий // Критика и семиотика. Вып. 7, 2004. Новосибирск : Новосибирский государственный университет. С. 98–123.
4. Amitav Acharya. Singapore’s Foreign Policy. The Search for Regional Order. American University, USA. 2007. P. 216.
5. Democracy Index 2012: Democracy at a Standstill. Economist Intelligence Unit. 14.03.2013 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex12 (дата обращения: 01.05.2020).
6. Democracy Index 2017. Economist Intelligence Unit. 08.03.2018 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://nonews.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Democracy_Index_2017.pdf (дата обращения: 01.05.2020).
7. Democracy Index 2018: Me too? Political Participation, Protest and Democracy. The Economist Intelligence Unit. The EIU [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://nonews.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DI2018.pdf (дата обращения:01.05.2020).
8. Dijk T. A. van. Ideology and Discourse Analysis / Journal of Political Ideologies. London : Routledge, 2007. P. 115–140.
9. Dijk T. A. van. Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis / Language and Peace / eds. C. Schäffner & A. Wenden. Aldershot : Dartmouth Publishin, 1995.
10. Dijk T. A. van. Ideological Discourse Analysis. New Courant. English Dept. University of Helsinki, 1995. P. 135–161.
11. Dijk T. A. van. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. L. : Sage, 1998. P. 374.
12. Regnier Ph. The End of the “Asian Model”? / под. ред. H. Henke и J. Boxill, Amsterdam Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000. P. 217.
13. Wight M. Power Politics / London : Pelican, 1978.
Review
For citations:
Titovich A.M. The Discourse of the Republic of Singapore Foreign Policy Strategy in the Field of Ensuring Regional Security in the Second Half of the 2010s. Novelty. Experiment. Traditions (N.Ex.T). 2020;6(1):64-78. (In Russ.)