The Discourse on a United Europe and the Problem of Normalizing German History
Abstract
Introduction: The paper deals with the critical analysis of the discourse on a united Europe and the role of the normalization of German history as a particular justification for its implementation. It is noted that the beginning of the third decade of the 21st century was marked by the crisis of European identity, which forced politicians to once again address the theses about the unity of Europe. In this regard, the research question is being formed: is it possible to talk about the real unity of Europe, as it is represented by European politicians in their public speeches? Materials and Methods: Using a historical and discursive approach, the author attempts to consider the solution of the German question, since the example of Germany is the most representative due to the fact that it is one of the most significant participants in European integration associations. Research Results and Discussion: As a result of the conducted research, the following characteristic of the declared discourse on European unity is revealed: the normalization of German history in the discourse on European unity masks Germany’s “special path”, representing it as a typical development case. Conclusions: It is concluded that the normalization of German history within the framework of the discourse on European unity is nothing more than a political pamphlet necessary to link the European states based on the myth of the historical community of their nations. At the same time, it is emphasized that further work on deconstructing the myth of European unity seems very promising for distinguishing the spheres of historical science and political activity.
About the Author
B. A. SnigirevRussian Federation
Bogdan A. Snigirev - BA student, School of World Politics
References
1. Artamoshin, S. V. (2002) The ideological origins of National Socialism. Bryansk: BSU Publishing House. 184 p. (In Russ.)
2. Akhtamzyan, A. A. (2010) The unification of Germany and its international and political consequences // Lomonosov World Politics Journal. No. 4. Pp. 3–26. (In Russ.)
3. Grosheva, G. V. (2014) German discourse on the past and the problem of the correlation of national and European identities of Germans (the second half of the twentieth – early twenty-first century) // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. No. 3 (5). Pp. 57–67. (In Russ.)
4. Kosmach, V. A. (2015) “Humiliation at Versailles”: the results of the First World War for Germany // Pskov Military Historical Bulletin. No. 1. Pp. 155–167. (In Russ.)
5. Miller, A. I. (2006) The Romanov Empire and Nationalism: an essay on the methodology of History. research. Moscow: New Literary Review. 240 p. (In Russ.)
6. Miller, A. I. (2004) The Russian Empire in comparative perspective. Collection of articles. Moscow: New Publishing House. 384 p. (In Russ.)
7. Miller, A. I. (2008) The History of Empires and the Politics of Memory // Russia in Global Affairs. Vol. 6, no. 4. Pp. 118–134. (In Russ.)
8. Sipols, V. Ya. (1979) The diplomatic struggle on the eve of the Second World War. Moscow: International Relations. 320 p. (In Russ.)
9. Furtsev, R. V. (2016) Empire and territorial states of Germany of the early Modern period in the context of the formation of the European state system // MCU Journal of Historical Studies. No. 1 (21). Pp. 78–89. (In Russ.)
10. Hauer-Tyukarkina, O. M. (2016) The European Union as a political myth // Russian Political Science. No. 1. Pp. 124–136. (In Russ.)
11. Chubaryan, A. O. (1987) The European idea in history. The problem of war and peace. Moscow: International Relations Publishing House. 352 p. (In Russ.)
12. Chubaryan, A. O. (2006) Russian Europeanism. Moscow: OLMA Media Group. 416 p. (In Russ.)
13. Schuman R. (2002) For Europe = Pour L’Europe / [translated from French by V. Bozhovich]. Moscow: Moscow School of Political Studies. 95 p.
14. Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
15. Churchill, W. S. (1973) Great Contemporaries. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
16. Kissinger, H. (1994) Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
17. Marcellino, C., Hooghe, M., & De Sio, L. (2026). The Role of EU Policies in Shaping EU Support: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of Policy Congruence and Public Attitudes in the European Union.
18. Nolte, E. (1987) Der europäische Bürgerkrieg 1917–1945. Nationalsozialismus und Bolschewismus. Frankfurt a. M.: Propyläen.
19. Puntscher Riekmann, S. (1997) The Myth of European Unity // Myths and Nationhood / G. Hosking, G. Schopflin, eds. London: Hurst & Company. Pp. 60–71.
20. Ismay, H. L. (1960) The Memoirs of General the Lord Ismay. London: Heinemann.
21. Ristevska, T. T. (2024) European Unity and security: from post-war integration to modern challenges in defense and governance // Journal of Law and Politics. Vol. 5, no. 2. Pp. 97–113.
22. Todorova, М. (2000) Does Russian Orientalism Have a Russian Soul? A Contribution to the Debate between Nathaniel Knight and Adeeb Khalid // Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. Vol. 1, no. 4. Рp. 717–727.
23.
Review
For citations:
Snigirev B.A. The Discourse on a United Europe and the Problem of Normalizing German History. Novelty. Experiment. Traditions (N.Ex.T). 2026;12(1 (33)):75-86. (In Russ.)
JATS XML











