Preview

Novelty. Experiment. Traditions (N.Ex.T)

Advanced search

The Brexit Party: Modern European Populism From a Poststructuralist Perspective

E. M. Barabanova

Academic Supervisor:
Dmitry N. Baryshnikov, Associate Professor, PhD in Political Sciences; Saint Petersburg University; the School of International Relations, the Chair of World Politics 

Abstract

This article scrutinizes the Brexit party through the lens of the poststructuralist concept of populism proposed by Ernesto Laclau. The author has put forward a hypothesis whereby the Brexit party represents a new phenomenon in the political conjuncture of Europe — the ad hoc party, whereas its activity embodies the concept of disintegrational populism. The author formulates the distinctive features of the ad hoc party and disintegrational populism, which can be subsequently used in studies of European party systems. The paper argues that, unlike traditional parties, ad hoc parties which execute the logic of equivalence in their endeavors possess greater flexibility and capability to accomplish their party-constituting goals. In addition, the author suggests that disintegrational populism, alongside the logic of equivalence as the modus operandi of the party, is the most advantageous model of activity for ad hoc parties due to the peculiarities of the European political conjuncture. The research may become a theoretical contribution to the classification and taxonomization of European political parties provided the features of the European political conjuncture elucidated in the paper persist. In this regard, further research into ad hoc parties might prove extremely relevant in terms of understanding the features of modern socio-political processes in Europe.

About the Author

E. M. Barabanova
Saint Petersburg University
Russian Federation

Elizaveta M. Barabanova, ВА student, the School of International Relations

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Ананьева Е. В. Разобщенная Британия // Современная Европа, 2017. № 5. С. 5–15.

2. Ананьева Е. В. Растерянная Британия // Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН, 2018. № 5. С. 27–32.

3. Буторина О. В. Сужение Европейского союза и потенциал интеграции // Современная Европа, 2020. № 2. С. 20–32.

4. Кавешников Н. Ю. Некоторые последствия Brexit для развития Европейского союза // Вестник МГИМО-Университета, 2016. Т. 6. № 51. С. 24–30.

5. Collyer M., Hinger S., Schweitzer R. Politics of (Dis)Integration — An Introduction // IMISCOE Research Series, 2019. P. 1–18.

6. Fieldhouse E., Evans G., Green J., Mellon J., Prosser C. Volatility, Realignment and Electoral Shocks: Brexit and the UK General Election of 2019 [Электронный ресурс] // SSRN Electronic Journal. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348545904_Volatility_Realignment_and_Electoral_Shocks_Brexit_and_the_UK_General_Election_of_2019 (дата обращения: 25.04.2022).

7. Laclau E. Populism: What’s in a Name? // Populism and the mirror of democracy. London: Verso, 2005. P. 32–50.

8. Lévi-Strauss K. Introduction to the Work Marcel Mauss. Translated by Felicity Baker. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950. P. 3–45.

9. Proctor K., Wearden G. Brexit Party Will Not Contest 317 Tory-won Seats, Farage Says [Электронный ресурс] // The Guardian. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/11/brexit-party-will-not-contest-317-tory-seats-nigel-farage-says (дата обращения: 25.04.2022).

10. Zulianello M. Varieties of Populist Parties and Party Systems in Europe: From State-ofthe-Art to the Application of a Novel Classification Scheme to 66 Parties in 33 Countries // Government and Opposition. Vol. 55. № 2. P. 327–347.


Review

For citations:


Barabanova E.M. The Brexit Party: Modern European Populism From a Poststructuralist Perspective. Novelty. Experiment. Traditions (N.Ex.T). 2022;8(3 (19)):6-13. (In Russ.)

Views: 197


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-3625 (Online)